AIFs
Alternative Investment Funds (AIF) in India: 2026 Guide
A practical breakdown of Alternative Investment Funds in India SEBI categories, taxation, liquidity risk and how to evaluate whether an…

For Investors, diversification becomes more complicated as portfolios grow.
Listed equities, mutual funds, fixed income and cash can form the core of a portfolio, but they do not provide access to every investment opportunity. Private companies, venture capital, infrastructure, private credit and specialised investment strategies sit outside much of the conventional investment universe.
Alternative Investment Funds, or AIFs, provide a regulated route to these opportunities.
But an AIF is not simply another way to seek higher returns. The investment can involve long holding periods, limited liquidity, complex valuations, manager dependence and significant capital commitments.
For a Investor, the more important question is therefore whether an AIF fits the portfolio, rather than whether the product itself looks attractive.
An Alternative Investment Fund is a privately pooled investment vehicle regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The AIF framework is governed by the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012, together with subsequent amendments, circulars and regulatory directions.
SEBI’s Master Circular for Alternative Investment Funds dated June 3, 2026 consolidates the operational framework applicable to AIFs and is an important reference for investors and fund managers.
SEBI Master Circular for Alternative Investment Funds, June 3, 2026
AIFs can invest in private equity, venture capital, infrastructure, private debt and other alternative strategies. Unlike conventional mutual funds, their investment universe can extend substantially into private markets and specialised strategies.
The size of India’s AIF industry has grown substantially. According to SEBI’s latest statistics, cumulative commitments raised by AIFs stood at ₹16,94,262 crore as of March 31, 2026, compared with ₹15,74,050 crore as of December 31, 2025. This represents an increase of ₹1,20,212 crore during the quarter.
| SEBI reporting period | Cumulative AIF commitments |
|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | ₹15,74,050 crore |
| March 31, 2026 | ₹16,94,262 crore |
| Increase | ₹1,20,212 crore |
Category II AIFs represented the largest segment, with cumulative commitments of ₹12,74,300 crore as of March 31, 2026. Category III stood at ₹3,14,713 crore, while Category I stood at ₹1,05,249 crore.
The growth makes alternative investments increasingly relevant for sophisticated investors. It also means investors have more strategies to compare, making manager selection, structure and portfolio fit increasingly important.
SEBI broadly classifies AIFs into three categories.
| Category | Typical investment focus | Leverage | Investor consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category I | Venture capital, infrastructure, SMEs and social ventures | Not permitted | Long-term growth and private-market exposure |
| Category II | Private equity, private debt and other strategies outside Categories I and III | Generally not permitted except permitted operational requirements | Private-market and credit exposure |
| Category III | Hedge fund and other complex trading strategies | Permitted subject to applicable framework | Higher complexity and market risk |
Category I AIFs invest in areas considered socially or economically desirable, including venture capital, infrastructure and SME opportunities.
The attraction is access to businesses and projects that may not be available through listed markets. The trade-off can be longer investment periods and greater dependence on the underlying business and exit environment.
Category II is currently the largest AIF segment by commitments. It includes private equity, private debt and other funds that do not fall within Category I or Category III.
For HNIs, Category II AIFs can provide meaningful access to private businesses and structured investment opportunities. But private-market exposure should not automatically be interpreted as lower risk. Business quality, entry valuation, leverage and exit assumptions remain critical.
Category III AIFs can use sophisticated strategies such as derivatives, arbitrage, long-short positioning and leverage.
The investor therefore needs to understand the actual source of returns. A strategy that appears diversified on paper may still carry substantial market, leverage or liquidity risk depending on how it is implemented.
The general minimum investment stated in the source material is ₹1 crore. A ₹25 lakh threshold applies to directors, employees and fund managers under specified conditions.
However, the minimum ticket size is only the starting point.
SEBI’s Accredited Investor framework provides eligible investors with additional flexibility in relation to certain AIF structures and terms. The regulatory framework has also evolved to provide greater flexibility for Large Value Funds and schemes intended for Accredited Investors.
For an HNI, accreditation can therefore matter beyond simply determining eligibility. It can affect the investment structure, terms and flexibility available to the investor, subject to applicable SEBI requirements.
Investors should verify their eligibility and the specific benefits applicable to the fund before making a commitment.
The AIF regulatory framework has become more operationally detailed. Three areas are particularly relevant.
AIF units are subject to SEBI’s dematerialisation framework. SEBI’s 2023 circular required schemes to dematerialise existing units within specified timelines and required new units to be issued in dematerialised form from the applicable dates.
The June 2026 Master Circular consolidates provisions relating to the issuance and credit of AIF units in dematerialised form, reporting of unit values to depositories, and related operational requirements.
For investors, this makes the demat account and depository infrastructure an important part of the operational process for AIF holdings.
SEBI requires at least one key personnel among the associated persons functioning in the key investment team of an AIF manager to obtain the NISM Series-XIX-C: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Certification Examination.
This is relevant from an investor-diligence perspective because the qualifications and experience of the investment team are central to assessing an AIF.
Investors should examine who actually makes investment decisions, their relevant experience and whether the team responsible for the strategy has remained stable across investment cycles.
SEBI introduced a framework in September 2025 allowing AIFs to undertake co-investment within the AIF structure under the applicable regulatory framework.
Where an AIF offers co-investment opportunities, investors should understand the specific structure, eligibility conditions, allocation mechanism, fees, conflicts and governance arrangements before participating.
The important point is that co-investment should not be treated as an automatic feature of every AIF. It is a specific framework and must be evaluated based on the particular fund structure.
The most important diligence questions are rarely limited to the projected IRR.
An investor should examine the fund’s strategy, manager, underlying assets, valuation methodology, fees, liquidity and exit assumptions.
| Area | Key question |
|---|---|
| Strategy | What is actually driving expected returns? |
| Manager | Has the team executed this strategy through different market conditions? |
| Track record | Are returns supported by realised exits or primarily unrealised valuations? |
| Alignment | How much capital does the manager or sponsor have invested? |
| Valuation | How are private and illiquid holdings valued? |
| Liquidity | What are the lock-in, redemption and exit provisions? |
| Fees | What is the investor’s expected return after all applicable costs? |
| Concentration | Could the fund create excessive exposure to one sector or theme? |
| Downside | What circumstances could result in permanent capital loss? |
| Exit | What is the realistic path and expected timeframe for returning capital? |
SEBI’s AIF regulatory framework also places importance on fund documentation and disclosures. Investors should therefore review the Private Placement Memorandum and other relevant fund documents, rather than relying only on marketing presentations.
The June 2026 Master Circular is an important regulatory reference for the operational framework surrounding AIFs.
Liquidity is one of the biggest differences between AIFs and conventional market investments.
Many AIF strategies invest in unlisted or less-liquid assets. Category I and Category II AIFs are generally close-ended, while Category III AIFs may be structured as open-ended or close-ended depending on the scheme.
This creates an important portfolio-construction issue.
Consider an illustrative example. An investor has ₹5 crore in listed technology and IT equities and commits another ₹1 crore to a Category II AIF investing primarily in private technology companies.
The investor has technically added another asset class, but the portfolio may not be as diversified as it appears. The underlying economic exposure remains concentrated in technology, while the AIF portion has materially lower liquidity.
This is why diversification should be measured by economic exposure and risk drivers, not simply by the number of investment products owned.
Taxation depends on the AIF category, the nature of income and the legal structure.
Category I and Category II AIFs generally receive pass-through treatment for specified income under the applicable provisions, including Section 115UB. Category III AIFs are generally subject to taxation at the fund level, subject to the applicable structure and tax provisions.
The source material notes capital gains rates of 12.5% for long-term capital gains on specified assets and 20% for short-term capital gains on equity-oriented assets under the relevant provisions.
Tax treatment can differ depending on the underlying investment, income character, fund structure and investor circumstances. Investors should therefore assess post-tax, post-fee returns, rather than comparing headline return projections alone.
Tax rules can change, so investors should obtain appropriate tax advice before making an investment decision.
Not necessarily. They generally serve different portfolio purposes.
| Factor | AIF | Mutual Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum investment | ₹1 crore generally | ₹500 |
| Typical investor | HNIs and sophisticated investors | Retail investors and HNIs |
| Liquidity | Generally lower | Generally higher |
| Investment universe | Can include private markets and specialised strategies | Primarily conventional market securities |
| Complexity | Generally higher | Varies by scheme |
| Portfolio role | Alternative or specialised exposure | Core or diversified market exposure |
An AIF may complement a mutual fund allocation rather than replace it.
The appropriate decision depends on what the existing portfolio already provides and whether the AIF introduces a genuinely different source of risk and return.
AIF due diligence does not end at subscription.
Investors should continue monitoring:
Changes in the investment team
Deployment of committed capital
Portfolio concentration
Valuation assumptions
Realised versus unrealised performance
Changes to the investment strategy
Progress of expected exits
Liquidity and fund-tenure developments
A particularly useful distinction is between reported performance and realised performance.
An increase in the reported valuation of a private investment is not the same as cash returned to investors. Understanding how much of a fund’s performance has been realised through actual exits can provide a more useful perspective on the quality and timing of returns.
AIFs can be relevant for HNIs, institutional investors and experienced investors with sufficient financial capacity and a long-term investment horizon.
An investor should generally be comfortable with:
The ₹1 crore general minimum investment requirement
Potentially long investment periods
Limited liquidity
Higher investment and valuation risk
Complex fund structures
The possibility of capital loss
Most importantly, the AIF allocation should not compromise the investor’s liquidity requirements or broader financial plan.
An AIF should be evaluated against the investor’s existing wealth structure.
An investor who already owns a private business, substantial real estate and several private-market investments may have more illiquidity than is immediately apparent. Adding another private-market strategy could increase concentration rather than improve diversification.
Similarly, an investor with substantial listed equity exposure may gain more from an alternative strategy with genuinely different return drivers than from another fund exposed to similar economic themes.
This is why AIF selection and asset allocation should be considered together.
The objective is not to maximise the number of alternative investments. It is to determine whether the allocation improves the portfolio’s overall risk-return profile without creating an unacceptable liquidity or concentration problem.
India’s AIF market has become substantial, with SEBI reporting cumulative commitments of ₹16,94,262 crore as of March 31, 2026.
For HNIs, AIFs can provide access to private markets and specialised strategies that conventional investments may not offer. But that access comes with greater complexity and, in many cases, less liquidity.
The quality of the investment decision therefore depends on more than the fund’s projected return. The manager, underlying assets, valuation process, fees, tax treatment, liquidity and role within the broader portfolio all need to be assessed together.
If you are interested in SME-focused investments and alternative investment opportunities, consult Artharich to understand how these strategies may fit within your investment objectives and portfolio.
The general minimum investment is ₹1 crore. A ₹25 lakh threshold applies to directors, employees and fund managers under specified conditions.
An Accredited Investor is an investor meeting the eligibility requirements under the applicable SEBI framework. Accredited Investor status can provide greater flexibility in certain AIF structures and investment terms, subject to applicable regulations.
AIFs are subject to SEBI’s dematerialisation framework, including requirements concerning issuance and holding of units in dematerialised form.
Yes. Tax treatment depends on the AIF category, income type, fund structure and applicable tax provisions. Category I and II AIFs generally have pass-through treatment for specified income, while Category III AIFs are generally taxed at the fund level.
NRIs and certain other eligible investors can invest in AIFs subject to applicable eligibility, regulatory and foreign exchange requirements.
No. An HNI should consider an AIF only after evaluating liquidity requirements, risk capacity, existing portfolio exposure, investment horizon, taxation and the specific fund strategy.